DSO:面向偏见缓解的直接引导优化
DSO: Direct Steering Optimization for Bias Mitigation
对做 VLM 公平性与推理时可控生成的人,这篇给出了一个可复用的手段:用强化学习直接优化激活空间中的线性引导向量,而不是依赖人工设定的启发式方向,从而在推理阶段按需调节公平性与能力的权衡。
原文依据 we propose Direct Steering Optimization (DSO) which uses reinforcement learning to find linear transformations for steering activations
摘要译文
由模型翻译 · 术语统一 · 请对照原文核对关键结论生成模型常被部署用于代替用户做决策,例如视觉语言模型(VLM)判断房间中哪个人是医生,以帮助视障人士。然而,VLM 的决策会受到输入中人物所呈现的人口统计属性的影响,从而产生诸如无法识别女性为医生之类的有偏结果。此外,当降低偏见带来性能损失时,用户对偏见缓解与模型整体能力之间的平衡可能有不同需求,这凸显了对能够在推理阶段实现可控偏见削减的方法的需求。激活引导是一种流行的推理时可控性方法,已被证明能在大型语言模型(LLM)中诱导更安全的行为。然而,我们观察到现有引导方法难以纠正那些要求各人口统计群体结果等概率的偏见。为此,我们提出直接引导优化(DSO),它使用强化学习寻找用于引导激活的线性变换,并针对在保持对模型性能控制的同时缓解偏见进行定制。我们证明,DSO 在 VLM 和 LLM 上均在公平性与能力之间取得最优权衡,同时为实践者提供推理时对该权衡的控制。总体而言,我们的工作凸显了设计直接优化以控制模型行为的引导策略的优势,相比依赖预定义启发式实现可控性的方法,能提供更有效的偏见干预。
英文原文摘要 1584 字符
Generative models are often deployed to make decisions on behalf of users, such as vision-language models (VLMs) identifying which person in a room is a doctor to help visually impaired individuals. Yet, VLM decisions are influenced by the perceived demographic attributes of people in the input, which can lead to biased outcomes like failing to identify women as doctors. Moreover, when reducing bias leads to performance loss, users may have varying needs for balancing bias mitigation with overall model capabilities, highlighting the demand for methods that enable controllable bias reduction during inference. Activation steering is a popular approach for inference-time controllability that has shown potential in inducing safer behavior in large language models (LLMs). However, we observe that current steering methods struggle to correct biases, where equiprobable outcomes across demographic groups are required. To address this, we propose Direct Steering Optimization (DSO) which uses reinforcement learning to find linear transformations for steering activations, tailored to mitigate bias while maintaining control over model performance. We demonstrate that DSO achieves state-of-the-art trade-off between fairness and capabilities on both VLMs and LLMs, while offering practitioners inference-time control over the trade-off. Overall, our work highlights the benefit of designing steering strategies that are directly optimized to control model behavior, providing more effective bias intervention than methods that rely on pre-defined heuristics for controllability.