数据集与评测 · CVPR2026 ·2026.06.03

VS-Bench:评估视觉语言模型在多智能体环境中策略能力的基准

VS-Bench: Evaluating VLMs for Strategic Abilities in Multi-Agent Environments

Zelai Xu、Zhexuan Xu、Xiangmin Yi、Huining Yuan、Mo Guang、Kaiwen Long 等 10 人

与你有关的部分

为视觉语言模型智能体提供多智能体、视觉落地的策略评测协议,包含感知识别、下一动作预测、归一化回报三个维度,可直接用于检验 VLM 在交互式视觉环境中的决策能力,并暴露感知强而推理弱的失效模式。

原文依据 we introduce Visual Strategic Bench (VS-Bench), a multimodal benchmark that evaluates VLMs for strategic abilities in multi-agent environments
可迁移到 视觉语言模型评测多智能体交互视觉决策动作预测

摘要译文

由模型翻译 · 术语统一 · 请对照原文核对关键结论

近期视觉语言模型(VLM)的进展已将其能力扩展到交互式智能体任务,但现有基准仍局限于单智能体或纯文本环境。相比之下,现实场景往往涉及多个智能体在丰富的视觉与文本语境中交互,这对多模态观测与策略交互两方面都构成挑战。为弥补这一空白,我们提出视觉策略基准(VS-Bench),一个评估 VLM 在多智能体环境中策略能力的多模态基准。VS-Bench 包含十个以视觉为基础的环境,覆盖合作、竞争与混合动机交互。VLM 智能体的性能从三个维度评估:以元素识别准确率衡量的感知;以下一动作预测准确率衡量的策略推理;以归一化回合回报衡量的决策。对十五个主流 VLM 的大量实验表明,尽管当前模型表现出较强的感知能力,但在推理与决策方面与最优性能仍存在显著差距,表现最好的模型仅达到 46.6% 的预测准确率与 31.4% 的归一化回报。我们进一步分析了影响性能的关键因素,开展了人类研究,并考察了失效模式,以更深入地理解 VLM 的策略能力。通过标准化评估并揭示现有模型的局限,我们期望 VS-Bench 成为未来策略多模态智能体研究的基础。

英文原文摘要 1571 字符

Recent advancements in Vision Language Models (VLMs) have expanded their capabilities to interactive agent tasks, yet existing benchmarks remain limited to single-agent or text-only environments. In contrast, real-world scenarios often involve multiple agents interacting within rich visual and textual contexts, posing challenges with both multimodal observations and strategic interactions. To bridge this gap, we introduce Visual Strategic Bench (VS-Bench), a multimodal benchmark that evaluates VLMs for strategic abilities in multi-agent environments. VS-Bench comprises ten vision-grounded environments that cover cooperative, competitive, and mixed-motive interactions. The performance of VLM agents is evaluated across three dimensions: perception measured by element recognition accuracy; strategic reasoning measured by next-action prediction accuracy; and decision-making measured by normalized episode return. Extensive experiments on fifteen leading VLMs show that, although current models exhibit strong perception abilities, there remains a significant gap to optimal performance in reasoning and decision-making, with the best-performing model attaining 46.6% prediction accuracy and 31.4% normalized return. We further analyze the key factors influencing performance, conduct human studies, and examine failure modes to provide a deeper understanding of VLMs' strategic abilities. By standardizing the evaluation and highlighting the limitations of existing models, we envision VS-Bench as a foundation for future research on strategic multimodal agents.

标签

会议 CVPR2026
页码 21561-21572
Bibkey
来源 CVF Open Access