CREval:面向复杂指令下创意图像编辑的自动化可解释评估
CREval: An Automated Interpretable Evaluation for Creative Image Manipulation under Complex Instructions
提供了一套基于问答的自动化评估流程和包含800多个样本、13K查询的基准,可用于系统评估图像编辑模型在复杂创意指令下的表现,替代不透明的MLLM直接打分。
原文依据 we propose CREval, a fully automated question-answer (QA)-based evaluation pipeline
摘要译文
由模型翻译 · 术语统一 · 请对照原文核对关键结论基于指令的多模态图像编辑近期取得了快速进展。然而,现有评估方法缺乏一个系统且与人类对齐的框架来评估模型在复杂创意编辑任务上的表现。为填补这一空白,我们提出CREval,一个全自动的基于问答(QA)的评估流程,克服了不透明多模态大语言模型(MLLM)打分的不完整性和可解释性差的问题。同时,我们引入CREval-Bench,一个专为复杂指令下的创意图像编辑设计的综合基准。CREval-Bench涵盖三个类别和九个创意维度,包含超过800个编辑样本和13K个评估查询。利用该流程和基准,我们系统评估了多种不同的最优开源和闭源模型。结果表明,尽管闭源模型在复杂创意任务上通常优于开源模型,但所有模型仍难以有效完成此类编辑。此外,用户研究表明CREval的自动指标与人类判断具有高度一致性。因此,CREval为评估图像编辑模型在复杂创意图像编辑任务上的表现提供了可靠基础,并突显了未来研究的关键挑战与机遇。
英文原文摘要 1373 字符
Instruction-based multimodal image manipulation has recently made rapid progress. However, existing evaluation methods lack a systematic and human-aligned framework for assessing model performance on complex and creative editing tasks. To address this gap, we propose CREval, a fully automated question-answer (QA)-based evaluation pipeline that overcomes the incompleteness and poor interpretability of opaque Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) scoring. Simultaneously, we introduce CREval-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for creative image manipulation under complex instructions. CREval-Bench covers three categories and nine creative dimensions, comprising over 800 editing samples and 13K evaluation queries. Leveraging this pipeline and benchmark, we systematically evaluate a diverse set of state-of-the-art open and closed-source models. The results reveal that while closed-source models generally outperform open-source ones on complex and creative tasks, all models still struggle to complete such edits effectively. In addition, user studies demonstrate strong consistency between CREval's automated metrics and human judgments. Therefore, CREval provides a reliable foundation for evaluating image editing models on complex and creative image manipulation tasks, and highlights key challenges and opportunities for future research.